The monthly publication of The
Group for the Reappraisal of the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis
The Group's members include medical scientists, physicians,
and other professionals from around the world who encourage a serious
and open reconsideration of the HIV explanation of AIDS. The Group's
members have identified solid scientific reasons to conclude that:
- HIV may be entirely harmless.
- People diagnosed with "AIDS" may be sick not from
HIV infections, but rather from other factors, such as one or more
of the following:
- Direct or indirect effects of recreational drug
consumption.
- Immunological exposure to foreign proteins,
such as through hemophilia clotting factor therapy and blood transfusions.
- Impoverished living conditions.
- Toxic chemotherapy with "anti-HIV" pharmaceuticals
such as AZT and protease inhibitors.
- Psychosomatic terror inspired by a positive
HIV diagnosis.
- Within the AIDS risk groups, AIDS conditions may
be common even in people who test HIV negative. This indicates a need
to look beyond HIV in order to explain AIDS, and a need to reconsider
the official AIDS definition, which limits diagnoses to patients with
presumed or diagnosed HIV infections.
- Pharmaceuticals prescribed to treat HIV infections
may actually cause some cases of AIDS.
- Most people who test HIV positive may have no active
HIV infections, including many AIDS patients.
- Contrary to the public health message that "everyone
is at risk for HIV and AIDS," the vast majority of even sexually active
Americans have no significant risk of either.
- Public officials, medical scientists, and social
activists may have accepted the infectious HIV/AIDS model with out
properly scrutinizing it.
- Public officials, medical scientists, and social
activists may have dismissed alternative models without properly considering
them.
- Public officials, medical scientists, and social
activists may have created an environment in which their peers feel
unable to express conclusions that contradict the HIV explanation
of AIDS, for fear of severe political, professional, and social penalties.
The Group formed in 1991 in support of
a letter urging a scientific reappraisal of the HIV-AIDS model. No medical
journal would publish this letter, even after hundreds of physicians,
scientists, and other professionals endorsed it.
Back issues
of the Reappraising AIDS newsletter
More information
about the controversy
www.rethinkingaids.com
|